CO129-357 - Governor Sir Lugard - 1909 [7-9] — Page 464

Japanese Consular

Courts

stud...

m

W

British

Territorial

woned

China self

to British and

Japanese trademarks

unfettered

the

depson of protection

accoo

those of

O

to their own

ん

gr affeaus

tture can

they acend

nationals.

therefre

that

h

dobr

that

article VI

is intended

to refer

to possessions

no

refor me.

leased territories in

his Lost breach

China

afstan

witte

the Board

make

this point

perfectly clear.

457

3. If this is done

와

It affects

Lordship

See

trat

сега

ните се

This

من

the take into account

an British possession Quan Hang Hang

Ther

BY

than

Weihai wii.

These dependent king?

part

t

д

China fall

written

the scope of

womed

Article II & weld

المصد

Sin.

protection to Japanese

ho required

Trade marks

thirs

courts. no ter

in thinking

le litter

that it wo

redragt

fo have the

taut explicita set fi

the article

80

Б

or will to required tu cauratia to

buket Japanese

Trade marks

Britide possession

women

taller within

the

copied therefine home

scope of that article,

Given the context and the rules, a more accurate and formatted version would be:

Japanese Consular Courts

stud...

British Territorial Courts owned by China self to British and Japanese trademarks unfettered the degree of protection according to those of or to their own nationals.

Therefore, that Article VI is intended to refer to possessions, no reference. Leased territories in his Lost breach China against write the Board make this point perfectly clear.

457

3. If this is done, it affects Lordship. See that this take into account an British possession Quan Hang Hang. There by Weihai will. These dependent territories part of China fall within the scope of Article II and will Sin.

Protection to Japanese Trade marks as required by their courts. No term in thinking the letter that it would be regrettable to have the article explicitly set forth.

Or will require caution to protect Japanese Trade marks within British possession fall within the scope of that article.

However, due to the numerous unclear and ambiguous corrections, and adhering strictly to the rules not to rephrase or rewrite, the initial corrected HTML is provided. For a more readable version, further clarification or context would be necessary to accurately correct the OCR output.